Home For Fiction – Blog

for thinking people

Patreon LogoPatreon

Religion in A Christmas Carol

May 15, 2018

Note: the following article on religion in A Christmas Carol is a modified excerpt (pp. 112-115) from my doctoral dissertation, “Time is Everything with Him”: The Concept of the Eternal Now in Nineteenth-Century Gothic, which can be downloaded (for free) from the repository of the Tampere University Press. For a list of my other academic publications, see here.

You can also find an article about religion in Bram Stoker’s Dracula and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

Religion in A Christmas Carol: a remarkably Secular Affair

Although religion in A Christmas Carol is mostly absent, the text still creates a framework of otherness based on Scrooge’s background and, in particular, his possible Jewishness. His occupation as a moneylender and the fact that he does not celebrate Christmas would have been obvious characteristic markers of Jewish origins for that time. Such stereotypes were not uncommon in Dickens’s works at large.

religion in a Christmas carol

In Oliver Twist, the character of Fagin is referred to as “the Jew” almost three hundred times and the novel abounds in descriptions “that directly link him to Judas Iscariot and even Satan” (Muller 2003, xxvii), with connotations of the classic depiction of the Wandering Jew also present (Felsenstein 1995, 241). The process of shifting from a racially motivated wariness – if not outright hostility – to an absolution has been suggested to exist within Dickens’s works, although not without controversy, as Grossman argues:

[T]his understanding of Dickens’ Jews elides how Dickens’ narrators engage the problem of narrating this racial and religious other. This elision has most obviously resulted in an institutionalized disregard for Dickens’ final 1867 revision of Oliver Twist, in which he only selectively deleted the term “the Jew”. (1996, 37; emphasis in the original)

(more…)

The Future of Poetry (and why It Is Bleak)

May 13, 2018

Matthew Arnold has made a famous, as-of-yet-unfulfilled prediction regarding the future of poetry.

The future of poetry is immense, because in poetry, where it is worthy of its high destinies, our race, as time goes on, will find an ever surer and surer stay … Our religion has materialised itself in the fact, in the supposed fact; it has attached its emotion to the fact, and now the fact is failing it. But for poetry the idea is everything; the rest is a world of illusion, of divine illusion. Poetry attaches its emotion to the idea; the idea is the fact.

What Matthew Arnold failed to take into consideration was the paralyzing mediocrity that has overwhelmed this world. Not only has poetry not eclipsed religion (perhaps the term ‘dogma’ is easier to grasp in this context), but it has indeed become virtually extinct itself. The future of poetry looks grim, because the future of humanity looks grim itself.

the future of poetry
The future of poetry is bleak in a world of mediocrity
(more…)

Should You Avoid Mixed Metaphors?

May 7, 2018

A mixed metaphor is the intermixing of two or more metaphors the literal meaning of which comes from different and incompatible areas. Apart from my cheeky example in the note above, also consider the following:

  • I shall make no bones about the skeleton in the closet.
  • We’ve got to grab the bull by the tail and look him in the eye.
  • He’s like a duck out of water.

As you might already guess, the juxtaposition of such incongruous elements can have a profoundly humorous effect. However, humor is not the only possible option for mixed metaphors, as we shall see below. Whether to avoid mixed metaphors or not depends entirely on the intended meaning.

Avoid Mixed Metaphors
You don’t HAVE to avoid mixed metaphors, provided you know how to use them

 

(more…)